Puentes

(HC) Clayton v. Puentes

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 27, 20201:19-cv-00284California1,692 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HAROLD CLAYTON, Case No. 1:19-cv-00284-DAD-JDP Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

GRANT RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO

v. DISMISS G. PUENTES, OBJECTIONS DUE IN THIRTY DAYS Respondent. ECF No. 11 16 17 Petitioner Harold Clayton, a federal prisoner without counsel, petitioned for a writ of 18 habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. ECF No. 1. Petitioner claims that the Bureau of Prisons 19 (“BOP”) has wrongfully withheld from him: (1) up to 15 days of certain incentive time credits per 20 30 days of prison service; (2) 54 days of good time credit (“GTC”) per year of incarceration; and 21 (3) placement in home confinement. Id. at 2-4. On March 23, 2020, respondent moved to 22 dismiss the petition for lack of standing, ripeness, and jurisdiction, and for mootness and failure 23 to exhaust administrative remedies. ECF No. 11 at 1. Petitioner has not responded to 24 respondent’s motion to dismiss and the time for doing so has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.