Fisher

(PC) Hunter v. Fisher

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 27, 20201:19-cv-00625California559 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 NATHAN HUNTER, Case No. 1:19-cv-00625-AWI-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING

v. ORDER FISHER, et al., (ECF No. 43) Defendants. Exhaustion Motion Deadline: June 8, 2020 14 Plaintiff Nathan Hunter (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendants Cui,1 Thompson, Fisher, and Hernandez for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Pursuant to the Court’s February 24, 2020 Discovery and Scheduling Order, the deadline for filing motions for summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies is May 24, 2020. (ECF No. 34.) Currently before the Court is Defendants’ May 22, 2020 motion to modify the scheduling order to extend the deadline to file a motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.