Stiles

Stiles v. Walmart, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 27, 20202:14-cv-02234California1,544 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHARIDAN STILES, et al., No. 2:14-CV-2234-KJM-DMC Plaintiffs, v. ORDER WALMART INC., et al., Defendants.

AND RELATED ACTIONS

18 Plaintiffs, who are proceeding with retained counsel, bring this civil action. Pending before the Court is plaintiffs’ motion to strike errata to the transcript of the deposition of Walmart’s witness, Carmen Bauza. See ECF No. 430. The parties have filed under seal a redacted joint statement regarding the discovery dispute. See ECF No. 443. The matter was submitted on the joint statement without oral argument. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / I. SUMMARY OF DISPUTE On January 22, 2020, plaintiffs’ counsel took the deposition of Walmart witness Carmen Bauza, a former Walmart Senior Vice President. See ECF No. 443, pg. 6. On February 20, 2020, Walmart’s counsel provided plaintiffs’ counsel an errata sheet completed by Ms. Bauza following…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.