CDCR

(PC) Gomez v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 27, 20202:17-cv-01247California331 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDWARD GOMEZ, No. 2: 17-cv-1247 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

CDCR, et al., Defendants. 16 By order filed February 28, 2020, this court directed plaintiff to file a pretrial statement on or before May 16, 2020. Plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order. The court will therefore recommend that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f); Local Rule 110. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendants are relieved from filing a pretrial statement. 2. The pretrial conference set for June 13, 2020, is vacated; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f); Local Rule 110. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.