(PS) Cody v. California Superior Court in and for Trinity County

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEON CODY, ET AL., No. 2:19-cv-02383-JAM-KJN PS Plaintiffs, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT IN

AND FOR TRINITY COUNTY, ET AL.,

15 Defendants.

17 On March 25, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF. No. 18 55) herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the 19 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. On April 6, 2020, plaintiffs 20 filed objections to the proposed findings and recommendations (ECF. No. 56), which have been 21 considered by the court. 22 This court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which an 23 objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore 24 Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982); see 25 also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). As to any portion of the proposed 26 findings of fact to which no objection has been made,…