Burns

(PC) Howell v. Burns

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 28, 20201:19-cv-00715California775 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KAREEM J. HOWELL, Case No. 1:19-cv-00715-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO MODIFY THE DISCOVERY

v. AND SCHEDULING ORDER

MR. J. BURNS, et al., (ECF No. 23) Defendants.

16 Kareem J. Howell (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 10, 2020, the discovery and scheduling order issued setting pretrial dates in this action. (ECF No. 21.) On May 27, 2020, Defendants filed a motion to modify the discovery and scheduling order. (ECF No. 23.) Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that a scheduling order may be modified upon a showing of good cause and with the Court’s consent. Fed R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). In considering whether a party moving to modify a scheduling order has demonstrated good cause, the diligence of the party seeking the modification is of the utmost importance. Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.