(SS) Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SARINA ELAINE CLARK, No. 1:19-cv-01587-GSA
11 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY v. CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY
ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social WITH COURT ORDER Security, 15 Defendant. Doc. 11
Paragraph 3 of the Scheduling Order (Doc. 5) provides that within thirty (30) days after 19 service of the administrative record Plaintiff shall serve Defendant with a confidential letter brief 20 and shall file with the Court a separate proof of service of the confidential letter brief. Although 21 the administrative record in this case was filed with the Court on March 25, 2020 (Doc. 10), 22 Plaintiff has not filed proof that a confidential letter brief was served on Defendant within thirty 23 days thereafter. On May 11, 2020, the Court directed Plaintiff to file such proof of service within ten days. Doc. 11. Plaintiff did not timely file a proof of service or any other document with the Court.…