Davis

Davis v. Doe

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 28, 20201:19-cv-01299California1,467 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CHARLES L. DAVIS. CASE NO. 1:19-cv-01299-DAD-EPG 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT

v. MATTER JURISDICTION

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN JERRY DOE, et al., TWENTY-ONE DAYS 14 Defendants. (ECF No. 6 ) 15 Plaintiff, Charles Davis (“Plaintiff”), is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed September 16, 2019. (ECF Nos. 1, 2). Plaintiff’s complaint asserts constitutional claims against the Kings Gospel Mission and a lead staff member there. Because those appeared to be private entities, not subject to the Constitution or section 1983, the Court ordered Plaintiff on April 16, 2020 to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction within 30 days. (ECF No. 6). Plaintiff has not responded to the Court’s order. Accordingly, the Court recommends…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.