Borum

(PC) Shepard v. Borum

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 28, 20201:18-cv-00277California819 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAMONT SHEPARD, No. 1:18-cv-00277-DAD-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING

M. BORUM, Correctional Officer at Kern PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY Valley State Prison, et al., JUDGMENT, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 28, 53, 59)

17 18 Plaintiff Lamont Shepard is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 16, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be denied because there are genuine disputes of material facts precluding summary judgment. (Doc. No. 53.) The magistrate judge simultaneously discharged an order to show cause…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.