(PC) Frisby v. California City Correctional Facility

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 28, 20201:19-cv-01403California410 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK RAYMOND FRISBY, Case No. 1:19-cv-01403-NONE-JDP

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

v. CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, FAILURE

CALIFORNIA CITY CORRECTIONAL

TO PROSECUTE, AND FAILURE TO

FACILITY, et al., COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER Defendants. THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought 16 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint was screened on February 26, 2020, and plaintiff 17 was ordered to file an amended complaint within thirty days because he failed to state a claim. 18 ECF No. 10. However, no response to the screening order or first amended complaint was ever 19 filed. 20 To manage the docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires 21 litigants to meet those deadlines. When a plaintiff fails to comply with court-imposed 22 deadlines, the court may dismiss the plaintiff’s case for failure to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.