(PC) Frisby v. California City Correctional Facility
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 28, 20201:19-cv-01403California410 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MARK RAYMOND FRISBY, Case No. 1:19-cv-01403-NONE-JDP
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
v. CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, FAILURE
CALIFORNIA CITY CORRECTIONAL
TO PROSECUTE, AND FAILURE TO
FACILITY, et al., COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER Defendants. THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE
15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought 16 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint was screened on February 26, 2020, and plaintiff 17 was ordered to file an amended complaint within thirty days because he failed to state a claim. 18 ECF No. 10. However, no response to the screening order or first amended complaint was ever 19 filed. 20 To manage the docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires 21 litigants to meet those deadlines. When a plaintiff fails to comply with court-imposed 22 deadlines, the court may dismiss the plaintiff’s case for failure to…