(SS)(PS) Bockari v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 28, 20202:19-cv-00698California438 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PATRICK A. BOBKARI, No. 2:19-cv-00698-TLN-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Patrick A. Bobkari (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding in this social security action pro se and in forma pauperis. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(15) and (21). On April 13, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 30.) On May 6, 2020, Plaintiff filed Objections to the Findings and Recommendations. (ECF No. 31.) This Court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.