(HC)Moore

(HC)Moore v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 28, 20202:19-cv-01131California586 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARQUIS DOMINIQUE MOORE, No. 2:19-cv-1131 MCE KJN P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS STU SHERMAN, Respondents. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On January 27, 2020, respondent filed a motion to dismiss this action because it was filed beyond the one-year statute of limitations. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Petitioner did not oppose the motion. By order filed March 5, 2020, petitioner was ordered to show cause, within thirty days, why this action should not be dismissed based on his failure to file an opposition. On April 6, 2020, petitioner filed “objections,” but on April 16, 2020, the undersigned found that petitioner’s objections failed to address respondent’s motion to dismiss, instead arguing the merits of his petition. Petitioner was granted an additional thirty days in which to oppose respondent’s motion, and reminded…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.