Ramirez-Castellanos

Ramirez-Castellanos v. Nugget Market, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 28, 20202:17-cv-01025California7,174 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 JIMMY DAVID RAMIREZ- No. 2:17-cv-01025-JAM-AC CASTELLANOS and FRANCISCO JAVIER GOMEZ ESPINOZA, Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT NUGGET

v. MARKETS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

NUGGET MARKET, INC. DBA

NUGGET MARKETS AND ONE STOP

SERVICES DBA ONE STOP

SOLUTION, AND DOES 1-10,

18 Defendants. 19 Jimmy David Ramirez-Castellanos (“Ramirez-Castellanos”) and Francisco Javier Gomez Espinoza(“Espinoza”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) sued their former employers, Defendants Nugget Market, Inc., dba Nugget Markets (“Nugget”), One Stop, and Issa Quara, for allegedly discriminating and retaliating against them based on their Latino national origin. First Amend. Compl. (“FAC”), ECF No. 45. Defendant Nugget now moves for summary judgment, Mot. Summ. J. (“Mot.”), ECF No. 92. Plaintiffs oppose this Motion. Opp’n, ECF No. 102. For the reasons set forth below the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.