Singh

Johnson v. Singh

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 28, 20202:17-cv-00368California3,361 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SCOTT JOHNSON, No. 2:17-cv-00368-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. (ECF No. 19) HARJIT SINGH, et al., Defendants. 16 INTRODUCTION Presently before the court is plaintiff Scott Johnson’s motion for default judgment against defendants Harjit Singh, Jasjit K. Singh, and Heli Villasenor. (ECF No. 19.) After defendants failed to file an opposition to the motion in accordance with Local Rule 230(c), the motion was submitted on the record and written briefing pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). (ECF No. 20.) For the reasons discussed below, the court recommends that plaintiff’s motion for default judgment be GRANTED IN PART on the terms outlined below. BACKGROUND Plaintiff initiated this action on February 20, 2017, alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq. (“ADA”) and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51 et seq. (See generally…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.