(SS) Freehoffer v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 29, 20202:18-cv-02391California4,272 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERICA ANN WINTERS FREEHOFFER, No. 2:18-cv-2391-EFB Plaintiff, v. ORDER ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her applications for a period of disability and Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 19 & 20. For the reasons discussed below, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is granted, the Commissioner’s motion is denied, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings. I. Background Plaintiff filed applications for a period of disability, DIB, and SSI, alleging that she had been disabled since February 17, 2013. Administrative Record (“AR”) 221-238. Her applications were denied initially and upon reconsideration. Id. at 122-26,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.