Barber

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEENAN WILKINS, aka NERRAH No. 2:19-cv-1338 KJN P

BROWN,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 14 DR. CHRISTINE S. BARBER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 18, 2020, plaintiff filed objections to this court’s May 7, 2020 order denying plaintiff’s motion to vacate the current scheduling order. Plaintiff sets forth various reasons why he objects, some of which this court construes as plaintiff’s request to reconsider the order denying plaintiff’s motion to amend. Upon reconsideration, the undersigned is persuaded by plaintiff’s objection under Rhodes v. Robinson, 621 F.3d 1002, 1007 (9th Cir. 2010) (new claims asserted in an amended complaint are to be considered by the court so long as administrative remedies with respect to those new claims are exhausted before the amended complaint is tendered to the court for filing). Therefore, the May…