Tiner

Tiner v. Ford Motor Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 29, 20201:19-cv-01599California3,017 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MINTA LOUISE TINER, No. 1:19-cv-01599-DAD-JLT Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND

THIS ACTION FOR LACK OF SUBJECT

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al., MATTER JURISDICTION Defendants. (Doc. No. 7) 16 This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motion to remand this action to the Kern County Superior Court. (Doc. No. 7.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the court found this matter suitable for a decision on the papers and took it under submission on March 11, 2020. (Doc. No. 12.) For the reasons set forth below, the court will grant plaintiff’s motion to remand. BACKGROUND On October 2, 2019, plaintiff filed this action against defendants Ford Motor Company (“Ford”), Haberfelde Ford, Inc. dba Jim Burke Ford (“Haberfelde”), and Does 1 through 10, inclusive (collectively “defendants”) in the Kern County Superior Court. (Doc. No. 1 at 9.) Plaintiff brings claims under California’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.