Asman

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THOMAS SCHMITZ, et al., Case No. 2:20-cv-00195-JAM-CKD (PS) 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO REDACT PROOFS OF v. SERVICE 14 A. ASMAN, et al., Defendants. 17 Defendants Asman, Bradley, Brunkhorst, Burns, and Lizarraga (“Defendants”) move to redact their home addresses from the proofs of service previously filed with the Court (ECF No. 13 at 14, 16; ECF No. 15; ECF No. 16). After full consideration, and good cause appearing, the Court grants Defendants’ motion. Defendants are peace officers, and disclosure of their home addresses violates the public policy of confidentiality, and jeopardizes Defendants’ safety and security. Hackett v. Superior Court, 13 Cal.App.4th 96, 100 (1993); Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003). Further, defendants have represented that they contacted the plaintiffs who have no objection to this request. //// //// wOAIe…