Delaney
(PC) Magee v. Delaney
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUCHELL CINQUE MAGEE No. 2:19-cv-1634 DB P
PREFILING ORDER,
12 Plaintiff, ORDER AND FINDINGS AND v. RECOMMENDATIONS 14 CAROLYN K. DELANEY, et al., 15 Defendants.
18 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 19 § 1983. (ECF No. 1). This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 20 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). For the reasons stated below, the undersigned shall recommend that this 21 matter be dismissed with prejudice for failure to obey court orders. 22 In 1988, plaintiff was declared a vexatious litigant by District Court Judge Lawrence K. 23 Karlton. See generally In re Magee, No. 2:87-cv-0382 LKK (E.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 1988) 24 (“Magee”) (prefiling order dated September 6, 1988). As a result, any future pleadings plaintiff 25 presented to the court were to be lodged instead of filed and were to be accompanied by