Delaney

(PC) Magee v. Delaney

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 1, 20202:19-cv-01634California757 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUCHELL CINQUE MAGEE No. 2:19-cv-1634 DB P

PREFILING ORDER,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER AND FINDINGS AND v. RECOMMENDATIONS 14 CAROLYN K. DELANEY, et al., 15 Defendants.

18 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 19 § 1983. (ECF No. 1). This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 20 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). For the reasons stated below, the undersigned shall recommend that this 21 matter be dismissed with prejudice for failure to obey court orders. 22 In 1988, plaintiff was declared a vexatious litigant by District Court Judge Lawrence K. 23 Karlton. See generally In re Magee, No. 2:87-cv-0382 LKK (E.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 1988) 24 (“Magee”) (prefiling order dated September 6, 1988). As a result, any future pleadings plaintiff 25 presented to the court were to be lodged instead of filed and were to be accompanied by

Judge Karlton is now deceased. This matter is not accessible for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.