Pfeiffer

(HC) Salazar v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 1, 20202:20-cv-01000California369 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND JOSEPH SALAZAR, No. 2:20-cv-1000 AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER THE PEOPLE,1 Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. Petitioner has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Petitioner will be provided the opportunity to either submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or submit the appropriate filing fee. //// //// 24 The court notes for the record that petitioner is currently housed at Kern Valley State Prison. 25 See ECF No. 1 at 1. Christian Pfeiffer is the current warden at that facility. Therefore, the court shall direct the Clerk of Court to substitute his name as the respondent in this matter in lieu of “The People.” See Brittingham v. United States, 982 F.2d 378, 379 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.