(PS) Sharma v. HSI Asset Loan Obligation Trust 2007-1

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 1, 20202:20-cv-00921California967 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VINOD SHARMA AND No. 2:20–cv–921–JAM–KJN (PS)

VIJAY L. SHARMA,

ORDER Plaintiffs, (ECF Nos. 9, 12, 13) v.

HSI ASSET LOAN OBLIGATION

TRUST 2007-1 AND

HSI ASSET SECURITIZATION CORP.,

16 Defendants. 17 On July 18, 2019, plaintiffs filed a complaint in California Superior Court, alleging twelve claims against defendants in connection with plaintiffs’ residential mortgage. (ECF No. 1-1.) On May 8, 2020, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company removed to this court, asserting it is the “real party in interest” in this case and there is federal question jurisdiction. (ECF No. 1.) On May 11, Deutsche Bank filed a motion to dismiss, and ultimately set the matter for a hearing on June 11 before the undersigned. (ECF Nos. 5, 8.) Pursuant to this court’s Local Rules, plaintiffs were obligated to file and serve a written opposition or statement of non- opposition to the pending motion at least fourteen (14) days prior to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.