Sullivan

(HC) Andrus v. Sullivan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20201:19-cv-01540California695 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JASON A. ANDRUS, Case No. 1:19-cv-01540-NONE-JDP Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS THE

v. PETITION J. SULLIVAN, (Doc. No. 10) Respondent. 16 Petitioner Jason A. Andrus, a state prisoner without counsel, petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. No. 1.) This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 12, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that the pending petition be dismissed for petitioner’s failure to exhaust his claims by first presenting them to the highest court of the state for consideration. (Doc. No. 10.) The findings and recommendations were served on petitioner and contained notice that objections thereto were due within fourteen (14) days. (Id.) The time for filing objections has passed and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.