Cervantes

(PC) Perry v. Cervantes

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20201:20-cv-00356California2,020 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GARETH PERRY, Case No. 1:20-cv-00356-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

v. RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION

BE DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE,

C. CERVANTES, et al., FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST

AVAILABLE ADMINISTRATIVE

Defendants.

REMEDIES

14 (ECF No. 1)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

DAYS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN

DISTRICT JUDGE

19 Gareth Perry (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights 20 action. 21 It appeared from the face of the complaint that Plaintiff did not exhaust his available 22 administrative remedies before filing this action. Accordingly, the Court ordered Plaintiff to 23 “show cause why this action should not be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust 24 available administrative remedies.” (ECF No. 6, p. 4). Plaintiff has now responded to the 25 Court’s order to show cause. (ECF Nos. 9, 11, & 13). 26 For…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.