Davis

(PS) Walton v. Davis

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20202:18-cv-00080California1,133 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY WAYNE WALTON II, No. 2:18-cv-0080 TLN DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SUTTER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, Gregory Walton, is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On May 12, 2020, defendants Jason Davis and Scott Rounds filed a motion to compel and a motion for a protective order. (ECF Nos. 41 & 42.) Defendants’ motions are noticed for hearing before the undersigned on June 5, 2020. The parties’ briefing of these motions, however, violates the Local Rules. In this regard, defendants filed memorandums in support of their motions. (ECF Nos. 41-1 & 42-1.) In response, plaintiff filed oppositions to the motions. (ECF Nos. 43-45.) Then on May 29, 2020, the parties filed Joint Statements re Discovery Disagreements with respect to each motion. (ECF Nos. 47 & 48.) However, Local Rule…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.