(PC) Taylor v. Solano County Conflict Defenders Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20202:20-cv-00356California523 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRANDON LA’SHAUN TAYLOR, No. 2:20-CV-0356-KJM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECCOMMENDATIONS SOLANO COUNTY CONFLICT

DEFENDERS,

15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 24, 2020, the Court directed plaintiff to file an amended complaint 19 within 30 days. Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply may result in dismissal of this action 20 for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110. 21 More than 30 days have elapsed and plaintiff has not complied. 22 The Court must weigh five factors before imposing the harsh sanction of dismissal. 23 See Bautista v. Los Angeles County, 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000); Malone v. U.S. Postal 24 Service, 833 F.2d 128, 130 (9th Cir. 1987). Those factors are: (1) the public's interest in 25 expeditious resolution of litigation; (2) the Court's need to manage its own docket; (3) the risk of 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.