Hernandez

(PC) Brookins v. Hernandez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20201:17-cv-01675California771 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BARRY LEE BROOKINS, ) Case No. 1:17-cv-01675-AWI-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND v. ) MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE

COURT’S MARCH 26, 2020 ORDER

) M. HERNANDEZ, et al., ) [ECF No. 75] Defendants. ) ) )

Plaintiff Barry Lee Brookins is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for clarification, filed on May 28, 2020. The Court construes Plaintiff’s motion as a second motion for reconsideration under Rule 60(b) of the Court’s March 26, 2020 order denying his second motion to compel. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) governs relief from orders of the district court. The Rule permits a district court to relieve a party from a final order or judgment on grounds of: “(1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.