Komar

Project Sentinel v. Komar

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20201:19-cv-00708California1,583 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PROJECT SENTINEL, a California non- No. 1:19-cv-00708-DAD-EPG profit corporation, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S v. MOTION TO DISMISS 14 MEYER KOMAR, (Doc. No. 29) 15 Defendant.

17 This matter is before the court on defendant Meyer Komar’s motion to dismiss. (Doc. No. 29.) The court reviewed the relevant briefing and deemed the matter suitable for decision on the papers pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). (Doc. No. 35.) For the reasons set forth below, the court denies defendant’s motion. BACKGROUND On May 20, 2019, plaintiff Project Sentinel filed this action, alleging various claims arising from alleged housing discrimination against defendants Meyer Komar, Jeanette Komar, and Sarah Komar (“the Komars”). (Doc. No. 1) The complaint states that Project Sentinel, a non-profit fair housing organization, launched an investigation into the Komars’ rental practices after receiving a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.