Hemphill
Hemphill v. Farr
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20201:19-cv-01119California3,070 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MONTREAL D. HEMPHILL, Case No. 1:19-cv-01119-AWI-EPG 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION
PROCEED ON PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS
AGAINST DEFENDANT PALMER FOR
VIOLATION OF PLAINTIFF’S FIRST v. AMENDMENT RIGHT TO FREE EXERCISE OF RELIGION AND FOR VIOLATION OF
THE RELIGIOUS LAND USE AND
INSTITUTIONALIZED PERSONS ACT OF
2000, AND THAT ALL OTHER CLAIMS BE
CITY OF HANFORD POILCE DISMISSED
DEPARTMENT, et al.
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
Defendants. TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS
(ECF No. 6) 20 Plaintiff, Montreal D. Hemphill (“Plaintiff”), is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, 21 in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this lawsuit on August 15, 2019. (ECF No. 1). The Court issued a…