Perry

Perry v. Evenflo Company, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20202:20-cv-00377California1,090 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

WOOD L2.4VU UV VO LST MYVVULTICEI VVIVuey Payet

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL Fl L E D on Jun 03, 2020

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: EVENFLO COMPANY, INC.,

MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2938

TRANSFER ORDER

Before the Panel: Plaintiffs in three actions have filed two separate motions under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize pretrial proceedings in this litigation. Movants in two actions seek centralization in the District of Massachusetts. Movant in one action seeks centralization in the Eastern District of Wisconsin.’ Plaintiffs’ motions include eleven actions pending in eight districts, as listed on Schedule A. The Panel also has been notified of seventeen potentially-related actions filed in eight districts.” All responding parties support centralization. Plaintiffs in eight actions and potential tag- along actions support centralization in the District of Massachusetts. Defendant Evenflo Company, Inc. (Evenflo), and plaintiffs in seven actions and potential tag-along actions…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.