Gastello

(HC) Acedo v. Gastello

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 4, 20201:19-cv-00070California822 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL ACEDO, No. 1:19-cv-00070-DAD-SKO (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

JOSIE GASTELLO, Warden, (Doc. No. 21) Respondent.

16 Plaintiff Daniel Acedo is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 29, 2019, the court adopted in full the June 3, 2019 findings and recommendations issued by the assigned magistrate judge. (Doc. Nos. 17, 19.) In that order adopting the findings and recommendations, the court denied Acecdo’s petition for federal habeas relief due to his failure to exhaust his claims because he had not presented them to the California Supreme Court, and because his petition, in any event, did not state a cognizable claim for federal habeas relief. (Doc. No. 19 at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.