Barnes

Barnes v. Hanford Superior Court Judge

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 4, 20201:20-cv-00390California5,095 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTOINE DESHAWN BARNES, Case No. 1:20-cv-00390-AWI-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF

v. ACTION FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY

WITH A COURT ORDER, FAILURE TO

HANFORD SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE, et PROSECUTE, AND FAILURE TO STATE A al., COGNIZABLE CLAIM FOR RELIEF 14 Defendants. (ECF No. 18)

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN THIRTY

DAYS

17 Antoine Deshawn Barnes (“Plaintiff”) is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On March 6, 2020, Plaintiff filed this action in the Sacramento Division of the Eastern District of California against an unidentified state court judge and the Kings County District Attorney’s Office alleging excessive prosecution, double jeopardy, and Constitutional violations due to the failure to release him on bail. (ECF No. 1.) On March…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.