Dwivedi

(PC) Brookins v. Dwivedi

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 5, 20201:18-cv-00645California466 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BARRY L. BROOKINS, 1:18-cv-00645-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND

MOTION TO COMPEL AS PREMATURE

vs. (ECF No. 61.)

RAJENDRA DWIVEDI,

Defendant.

17 Barry L. Brookins (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Complaint filed on May 10, 2019, against sole defendant Dr. Rajendra Dwivedi (“Defendant”) for failing to provide adequate medical care in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 1.) On June 4, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel admissions and responses to interrogatories. (ECF No. 61.) This is Plaintiff’s second motion to compel.1 Plaintiff’s motion shall again be denied as premature. Plaintiff is reminded that discovery in this case has not yet been opened. When this case is ready for discovery the court will issue a 27 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.