Quillen

(PC) Harris v. Quillen

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 5, 20201:17-cv-01370California3,197 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEVONTE B. HARRIS, ) Case No. 1:17-cv-01370-DAD-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO v. ) COMPEL, AND DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO

PRODUCE DOCUMENTS FOR IN CAMERA

) T. QUILLEN, et al., REVIEW ) Defendants. ) [ECF No. 63] ) )

Plaintiff Devonte B. Harris is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to compel, filed on April 27, 2020. 20 I.

RELEVANT HISTORY

This action is proceeding against Defendants Sandor, Molina, Thomas and Bugarin for retaliation, and against defendants Quillen, Carranza, Alvarado, Hurtado, Perez and Magana for excessive force. Defendants filed an answer to the complaint on June 29, 2018. On July 2, 2018, the Court issued the discovery and scheduling order. /// /// As previously stated, on April 27,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.