Perez

Perez v. CVS Health Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 5, 20201:19-cv-00449California2,686 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FELIX PEREZ, an individual, on his own No. 1:19-cv-00449-DAD-BAM behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

v. FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION CVS HEALTH CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. 17 As a result of conclusory, confusing, and contradictory filings by the parties in this action, it is unclear to the court that it has subject matter jurisdiction1 over this action. The court will therefore order the parties to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The following background highlights the facts which have necessitated the issuance of this order. On January 16, 2019, plaintiff Felix Perez commenced this class action against defendant CVS Health Corporation, d/b/a CVS Caremark, and CVS Pharmacy, Inc. (collectively, “CVS”) in

“Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction.” Kokkonen…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.