(HC) Petersen v. Kern County District Attorney

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 5, 20201:19-cv-00975California2,283 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KYLE PETERSEN, Case No. 1:19-cv-00975-NONE-JDP Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

GRANT RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO

v. DISMISS KERN COUNTY DISTRICT OBJECTIONS DUE IN THIRTY DAYS

ATTORNEY,

ECF No. 18 Respondent. ORDER DISMISSING PETITIONER’S

MOTION TO WAIVE SERVICE

REQUIREMENT AS MOOT ECF No. 29 19 20 Petitioner Kyle Petersen, a state prisoner without counsel, petitioned for a writ of habeas 21 corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. On March 20, 2020, respondent moved to dismiss 22 the petition, arguing that it is untimely, its third claim is not cognizable, and its fourth claim is 23 unexhausted. See generally ECF No. 18. On April 27, 2020, petitioner filed an opposition, ECF 24 No. 30, and respondent replied on May 4, 2020, ECF No. 31. The matter is now ripe for review. 25 For the reasons stated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.