(HC)Sanchez

(HC)Sanchez v. Merlack

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 5, 20201:20-cv-00219California271 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FERNANDO MADUENO SANCHEZ, Case No. 1:20-cv-00219-JDP Petitioner, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

CLOSE CASE

v. ECF No. 10 STEVEN MERLACK, Respondent. 16 Fernando Madueno Sanchez, a federal prisoner without counsel, petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. ECF No. 1. On June 2, 2020, petitioner provided notice that he was voluntarily dismissing this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). ECF No. 10. Under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), a petitioner has the right to voluntarily dismiss his action prior to service by the respondent of an answer or a motion for summary judgment. See Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). The opposing party has not yet served an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, we direct the clerk’s office to close the case.

25

1 Although respondent filed a notice to dismiss, ECF No. 9, a pending motion to dismiss is not equivalent to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.