Pfeiffer

(HC) Cornejo v. Pfeiffer

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 5, 20202:20-cv-01125California551 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JESSE CORNEJO, No. 2:20-cv-1125 CKD P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner paid the filing fee. Under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, the court must review all petitions for writ of habeas corpus and summarily dismiss any petition if it is plain that the petitioner is not entitled to relief. The court has conducted that review. Court records reveal that petitioner has previously filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus attacking the conviction and sentence challenged in this case. See Cornejo v. Pfeifer, No. 2:18-cv-0572 JKS P. Before petitioner can proceed with the instant successive petition, he must obtain authorization from United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.