(PC) Smith v. Municipality of Fresno County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 8, 20201:19-cv-00651California4,016 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 GARY PAUL SMITH, CASE NO. 1:19-cv-00651-DAD-EPG 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT FOURTH

AMENDED COMPLAINT BE DISMISSED

v. FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH

PLEADING STANDARDS

13 SECRETARY CORRECTIONS RALPH (ECF No. 41) DIAZ ,et al.,

Defendants. 16 17 Gary Paul Smith (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on May 14, 2019. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint on June 10, 2019. (ECF No. 6). The Court screened Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, found that it failed to state any cognizable claims, provided relevant legal standards concerning deliberate indifference to a medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment, and gave Plaintiff leave to amend on November 7, 2019. (ECF No. 21). Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.