Miguel

(PC) Reed v. Miguel

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 8, 20201:20-cv-00121California364 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TAMECUS REED, Case No. 1:20-cv-00121-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS AND CLAIM

v.

M. MIGUEL, et al., 14-DAY DEADLINE

Defendants. Clerk of the Court to assign a District Judge 16 the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that it states cognizable retaliation claims against Defendants Miguel and Silva, but that the due process claim and the claims against Defendants Beltran and Cotter, were not cognizable. (Doc. 10.) The Court directed Plaintiff to file a first amended complaint curing the deficiencies identified in its order or notify the Court that he wishes to proceed only on the claims found cognizable. (Id. at 7.) Plaintiff has now filed a notice that he wishes to proceed only on the claims found cognizable and to “dismiss [his] due process claim and dismiss Beltran and Cotter as defendants.” (Doc. 11.) Accordingly, and for the reasons set forth in the Court’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.