(HC) Vela v. Montgomery
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 8, 20201:20-cv-00588California823 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MANUEL A. VELA, Case No. 1:20-cv-00588-EPG-HC
Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO
GRANT PETITIONER’S REQUEST TO
v. FILE FIRST AMENDED PETITION AND
TO GRANT REQUEST TO PROCEED
W.L. MONTGOMERY, WITH KELLY STAY
Respondent. (ECF Nos. 5, 8)
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
TO ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE
17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On April 28, 2020, the Court ordered Petitioner to show cause why Petitioner’s mixed petition should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust state court remedies. (ECF No. 4). On May 15, 2020, Petitioner requested to file an amended petition, conceding that his ineffective assistance of counsel (“IAC”) claim “should be dismissed without prejudice until Petitioner exhausts his state remedies.” (ECF No. 5). On May 18, 2020, the Court ordered Petitioner to notify the Court…