Luong

(PS) Velez v. Luong

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 8, 20202:19-cv-02410California565 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE VELEZ, No. 2:19-cv-2410 KJM DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

HARRY LUONG, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Jose Velez is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was, therefore, referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). (ECF No. 29.) On January 29, 2020, defendant Ramon Soltero filed an answer. (ECF No. 4.) On February 6, 2020, defendant Harry Luong filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 7.) On March 5, 2020, the undersigned issued an order to show cause due to plaintiff’s failure to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 8.) On March 6, 2020, plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal as to defendant Harry Luong only. (ECF No. 9.) Accordingly, on April 16, 2020, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations recommending that defendant Luong be dismissed from this action. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.