CSUS
(PS) Rigor v. CSUS
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 SORAYA MARIA RIGOR, No. 2:20-cv-00394-JAM-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER CERTIFYING PLAINTIFF’S
CLAIMS AS FRIVOLOUS AND REVOKING
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY HER IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS SACRAMENTO and DALE CARLSEN, 13 Defendants. 14 In February 2020, Rigor filed suit against California State University Sacramento (“CSUS”) and Dale Carlsen for “infringement of ideas of [the CSUS] student body” and discrimination. Compl., ECF No. 1. The allegations in this case mirror those in a suit she filed a year earlier. See Rigor v. California State University of Sacramento, et al., 2:19-cv-00633 KJM AC (“Rigor I”). Both cases stem from events surrounding CSUS’s “Global Entrepreneurship Week 2018.” Rigor I at ECF No. 12 at 5; Compl. at 7. In Rigor I, the magistrate judge granted Rigor leave to proceed IFP in and screened her complaint. The Court identified deficiencies in Rigor’s allegations and, twice, granted her leave to amend. Rigor I at ECF Nos. 3…