Brewer

(PS) Smith v. Brewer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 8, 20202:19-cv-01918California477 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEAN T. SMITH, No. 2:19-cv-1918 TLN DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENNIS BREWER, an individual domiciled in New Jersey; WINNETT PERICO, INC., a Colorado corporation, d.b.a. WINNETTORGANICS; WINNETTORGANICS, a business entity of unknown type; WINNETTORGANICS CATTLE COMPANY, INC., a Colorado corporation; WINNETT CATTLE COMPANY, INC. a Colorado corporation,

Defendants. 20 On May 8, 2019, plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment. (ECF No. 12.) Plaintiff’s motion is noticed for hearing before the undersigned on June 12, 2020, pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(19). Plaintiff’s motion notes that service of the motion on the defaulting defendants is not required pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules. (Pl.’s MDJ (ECF No. 12) at 4.) And the motion for default judgment does not include proof of service. It is true that service of a motion for default judgement on a defaulting party is not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.