Issa

Issa v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 10, 20202:20-cv-01044California2,036 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARRELL ISSA, JAMES B. OERDING, No. 2:20-cv-01044-MCE-CKD JERRY GRIFFIN, MICHELLE (and related case) BOLOTIN, and MICHAEL No. 2:20-cv-01055-MCE-CKD

SIENKIEWICZ,

13 Plaintiffs, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER v. 15 GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California, and ALEX PADILLA, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of California, 18 Defendants.

REPUBLICAN NATIONAL

COMMITTEE; NATIONAL

REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL

COMMITTEE; and CALIFORNIA

REPUBLICAN PARTY,

22 Plaintiffs, 23 v. 24 GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Governor of California; and ALEX PADILLA, in his official capacity as California Secretary of State, Defendants. 28 On May 8, 2020, California Governor Gavin Newsom issued Executive Order N-64-20, which requires all California counties to implement all-mail ballot elections for the November 3, 2020, federal elections (“Executive Order”). By way of the above- captioned…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.