Fisher

(PC) Hunter v. Fisher

Caution
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 9, 20201:19-cv-00625California1,259 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATHAN HUNTER, 1:19-cv-00625-AWI-BAM (PC)

Plaintiff, SECOND INFORMATIONAL ORDER –

NOTICE AND WARNING OF

v. REQUIREMENTS FOR OPPOSING

DEFENDANTS’ SUMMARY JUDGMENT

FISHER, et al., MOTION

Defendants. (ECF No. 46)

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Nathan Hunter (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendants Cui,1 Thompson, Fisher, and Hernandez for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. I. Rand Notice Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on June 8, 2020. (ECF No. 46.) Defendants indicated that the motion was accompanied by a Rand warning, (ECF No. 46, p. 1), but the Court finds no Rand warning was filed. Consequently, pursuant to Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012), Rand v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.