Fisher
(PC) Hunter v. Fisher
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATHAN HUNTER, 1:19-cv-00625-AWI-BAM (PC)
Plaintiff, SECOND INFORMATIONAL ORDER –
NOTICE AND WARNING OF
v. REQUIREMENTS FOR OPPOSING
DEFENDANTS’ SUMMARY JUDGMENT
FISHER, et al., MOTION
Defendants. (ECF No. 46)
TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE
Plaintiff Nathan Hunter (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendants Cui,1 Thompson, Fisher, and Hernandez for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. I. Rand Notice Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on June 8, 2020. (ECF No. 46.) Defendants indicated that the motion was accompanied by a Rand warning, (ECF No. 46, p. 1), but the Court finds no Rand warning was filed. Consequently, pursuant to Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012), Rand v.…