Palacios

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TIENGKHAM SINGANONH, No. 1:18-cv-00763-DAD-GSA (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

PALACIOS, et al., ACTION DUE TO PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE

TO STATE A COGNIZABLE CLAIM

Defendants. (Doc. No. 23) 16 Plaintiff Tiengkham Singanonh proceeds pro se and informa pauperis with this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. While plaintiff is a former state prisoner, at the time relevant to the allegations of his first amended complaint (“FAC”), plaintiff was a federal pretrial detainee in custody at the Fresno County Jail. (See Doc. No. 19.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 29, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge screened plaintiff’s FAC and issued findings and recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed due to plaintiff’s failure to state a cognizable claim against any…