Sherman

(PC) Sharpe v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 9, 20201:19-cv-00711California748 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ADAM SHARPE. CASE NO. 1:19-cv-00711-DAD-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, DISCOVERY ORDER CONCERNING THIRD-PARTY MEDICAL RECORDS

FOLLOWING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

v.

ORDER FOR CLERK TO PROVIDE

ADDITIONAL COPY OF FIRST STU SHERMAN, et al., INFORMATIONAL ORDER TO PLAINTIFF 14 Defendants. (ECF NO. 3)

16 17 On June 8, 2020, the Court held a Rule 16 telephonic scheduling conference. During the conference, and based on discussion with the parties and review of the scheduling conference statements, the Court determined that any third-party medical records obtained by any party should be shared with all parties. Neither party had an objection to such an order. In addition, Plaintiff Adam Sharpe asked about case resources. The Court notes that the First Informational Order in Prisoner/Civil Detainee Civil Rights Case (ECF No. 3) contains some additional information. The Court will direct the Clerk of Court to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.