Perez
(PC) Jones v. Perez
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND JONES, Case No. 1:19-cv-01553-NONE-JLT (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
v. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE
COURT’S ORDER
PEREZ, et al., 21-DAY DEADLINE Defendants.
16 On March 19, 2020, the Court issued a screening order directing Plaintiff to file a first amended complaint curing the deficiencies identified in the order. (Doc. 14.) On April 22, 2020, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time (Doc. 15) and provided Plaintiff 30 additional days to comply with the Court’s screening order. (Doc. 16.) Although more than the allowed time has passed, Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint. The Local Rules, corresponding with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, provide, “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with … any order of the Court may be grounds for the imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions … within the inherent power…