Mendoza

(PC) Davis v. Mendoza

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 9, 20201:19-cv-01142California1,306 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 CHARLES L. DAVIS, Case No. 1:19-cv-01142-DAD-EPG 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE v. DISMISSED FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S

DEPARTMENT OF ADULT PAROLE ORDERS AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

OPPERATIONS HANFORD,

TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

Defendant.

16 Plaintiff, Charles L. Davis, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. The address of record for Plaintiff indicates that he is no longer incarcerated. (See ECF No. 12.)1 For the reasons discussed below, the Court recommends that the case be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply and failure to prosecute. On February 10, 2020, the Court issued an Order Setting An Initial Scheduling Conference And Requiring Initial Disclosures And Scheduling Conference Statements. (ECF No. 21.) This order set an Initial Scheduling Conference for May 13, 2020, at 1:30 p.m., and noted that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.