Yarborough

(HC) Coronado v. Yarborough

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 10, 20201:04-cv-06012California747 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ISAAC MACIAS CORONADO, Case No. 1:04-cv-06012-AWI-SAB-HC

Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

v.

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

M. YARBOROUGH, APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

Respondent. (ECF No. 37)

15 Petitioner is a state prisoner who filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On March 31, 2008, the Court denied the petition and entered judgment. (ECF Nos. 28, 29). On November 21, 2019, the Court denied Petitioner’s motion for relief from judgment and declined to issue a certificate of appealability. (ECF No. 31). On January 27, 2020, Petitioner filed a motion for appointment of counsel. (ECF No. 32). On May 1, 2020,1 the Court construed the motion as a notice of appeal and directed the Clerk of Court to process the appeal. (ECF No. 33). On June 4, 2020, Petitioner filed the instant document, which the Court construes as a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and motion to appoint counsel. (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.